PulsAPI vs StatusGator

PulsAPI vs StatusGator: Which Status Aggregator Is Right for Your Team?

Both tools aggregate vendor status into one dashboard. StatusGator wins on catalog size (7,400+ services). PulsAPI goes deeper on SLA history, stack auto-discovery, and alert routing, with a free Starter tier.

No credit card required
30-day free trial
Setup in 5 minutes

The verdict

Pick StatusGator if you need the widest vendor list. Pick PulsAPI if you care about SLA and MTTR tracking, downtime budgets, stack mapping, and MCP access. StatusGator caps its $79/mo Starter plan at 25 monitors; PulsAPI Pro lifts the cap entirely at $29/mo, or $23/mo billed yearly.

Feature-by-feature comparison

An honest look at how PulsAPI and StatusGator stack up across the features that matter most.

FeatureOur pickPulsAPIStatusGator
Coverage & Monitoring
Services monitored2463+7,400+
Included monitorsUnlimited (Pro and above)25 (Starter, as published)
Component-level monitoring
Incident timeline & history90 days90 days
Analytics & SLA
SLA tracking & MTTR
Stack Impact Intelligence
AWS/GitHub stack auto-discovery
Downtime budget tracking
Response time percentiles (P50/P95/P99)
Alerts & Integrations
Alert channels (Slack, Discord, Teams, etc.)
Custom alert routing
Webhooks
Collaboration & Platform
Team collaboration & shared boards
API access
AI / MCP integration
Status page publishingComing soon
SSO / SAMLBusiness planEnterprise
Pricing
Starting price / monthFree$79
Free plan5 monitors, email alerts3 monitors

Comparison based on publicly available information as of 2026. Features may vary by plan tier.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about PulsAPI vs StatusGator.

Both PulsAPI and StatusGator aggregate cloud service statuses into a single dashboard. The key difference is depth vs breadth: StatusGator monitors 7,400+ services with broad coverage, while PulsAPI focuses on deeper analytics with AWS/GitHub stack auto-discovery, 90-day SLA tracking, MTTR calculations, downtime budget management, AI/MCP integration, and team collaboration. Price is the other difference: StatusGator's free plan covers 3 monitors and its paid plans start at $79/month for 25, while PulsAPI's free plan covers 5 and Pro is $29/month ($23 billed yearly) for unlimited.

It depends on what you need. PulsAPI fits teams that want SLA history, downtime budgets, and shared boards without paying StatusGator prices. StatusGator fits teams that need the biggest vendor catalog (7,400+ vs 2463+). Most teams find PulsAPI covers the vendors they actually run.

PulsAPI, from the first paid tier onward. The two free plans are the same size (3 monitors each), so the difference is what happens when you outgrow it. StatusGator keeps charging by monitor count at every tier: $79/month ($72 billed yearly) for 25, $137 for 75, $274 for 150, so each time your stack grows the bill moves. PulsAPI Pro at $29/month ($23 billed yearly) removes the monitor limit entirely and never reintroduces it, and includes SLA tracking and team collaboration that require higher-tier plans on StatusGator.

PulsAPI is one StatusGator alternative for teams that need SLA tracking, MTTR analytics, and team collaboration at a lower price point. Other alternatives include Better Stack (focused on synthetic monitoring), Instatus (focused on status page publishing), and Atlassian Statuspage (focused on customer-facing status pages).

No, StatusGator monitors 7,400+ services compared to PulsAPI's 2463+. However, PulsAPI covers the most widely used cloud services across 8 categories (Cloud, DevTools, CI/CD, Payments, Communication, Monitoring, CDN, and SaaS) and adds new services regularly. Most teams find PulsAPI covers their entire vendor stack.

Ready to try PulsAPI?

Join engineering teams who use PulsAPI to detect third-party outages before their users do.

No credit card required · 30-day free trial · Cancel anytime

PulsAPI vs StatusGator (2026)