Mention Outage History
2 incidents recorded over the last 365 days, 1 of them resolved, 1 still open. Durations are measured from when PulsAPI first saw the problem to when it cleared, which is usually longer than the vendor's own figure.
Every Recorded Mention Incident
| Date | Incident | Duration | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2026 | LinkedIn Listening: Reduced Mention VolumeWe're aware that LinkedIn listening/crawling volume has dropped significantly (approximately 66%) since 31 August, affecting alerts and mentions for LinkedIn keyword searches. We are actively investigating and will post… | — | Investigating |
| Apr 23, 2026 | Feed Loading IssueThe incident has been resolved. | 1h 10m | Resolved |
Hear about the next one while it is open
Everything above is a record written after the fact. We can email you when the next Mention incident opens instead, at the point where knowing still changes what you do.
Free, no password, no card. Unsubscribe in one click.
How to Read This Mention Incident Log
Each row is an incident PulsAPI observed, not a summary written afterwards. The duration is wall-clock time between the first failing check and the first clean one, so it includes the window before Mention acknowledged anything. Vendor post-mortems typically measure from acknowledgement, which is why their numbers are usually shorter.
Incidents still open have no duration yet and are listed as ongoing rather than being given a running total. The archive covers the last 365 days; anything older has aged out of the window rather than never having happened.
The longest single Mention outage in this window ran 1h 10m, against a mean recovery of 1h 10m. If you depend on Mention in a customer-facing path, the longest figure is the one to design around. The mean is what happens on a normal bad day; the maximum is what happens on the worst one.