InfluxDB Cloud logo

Is InfluxDB Cloud Down?

SaaSLive status, outages, and incident history

No. InfluxDB Cloud is up right now.

Every monitored InfluxDB Cloud system is operational as of November 9, 2026. PulsAPI did not find an outage in its latest check of the official status feed.

OperationalChecked 3m agoLive · every 60s

Know the moment InfluxDB Cloud breaks

InfluxDB Cloud is healthy right now. We keep checking (every 60 seconds) and email you when that changes.

Free, no password, no card. Unsubscribe in one click.

How we know: the official InfluxDB Cloud status page, PulsAPI's own check (every 60 seconds), and outage reports from engineers. How PulsAPI monitoring works

Status report

InfluxDB Cloud Status Summary

As of 21:22 UTC on 9 November 2026, InfluxDB Cloud is operational. PulsAPI checked InfluxDB Cloud's official status page and found 54 of 54 components operational, with no active incidents. Over the last 30 days PulsAPI measured 100.00% uptime for InfluxDB Cloud, counting degraded performance as up. The latest incident, "Query Performance Degradation in Azure West Europe", was on Sep 29, 2026 and lasted 84h 49m.

Cite as: PulsAPI, “InfluxDB Cloud status”, checked 9 November 2026, 21:22 UTC. https://www.pulsapi.com/services/influxdb-cloud

InfluxDB Cloud Component Status

The main InfluxDB Cloud systems on this page. All 54 are operational right now.

54operational
Cloud Dedicated » API Reads
Operational
Cloud Dedicated » API Writes
Operational
Cloud Dedicated » Management API
Operational

51 more components tracked

Their status is in the bar above. Free accounts see every component by name.

Also tracking Cloud Serverless: AWS, EU-Central » API Queries, Cloud Serverless: AWS, EU-Central » API Writes, Cloud Serverless: AWS, EU-Central » Compute, Cloud Serverless: AWS, EU-Central » Other, Cloud Serverless: AWS, EU-Central » Persistent Storage, Cloud Serverless: AWS, EU-Central » Tasks, Cloud Serverless: AWS, EU-Central » Web UI, Cloud Serverless: AWS, US-East-1 » API Queries, Cloud Serverless: AWS, US-East-1 » API Writes, Cloud Serverless: AWS, US-East-1 » Compute, Cloud Serverless: AWS, US-East-1 » Other, Cloud Serverless: AWS, US-East-1 » Persistent Storage, and 39 more.

See all of them free

Component statuses may change independently during partial outages.

Recent InfluxDB Cloud Outages & Incidents

Incident history from the official InfluxDB Cloud status page, including resolution updates.

Query Performance Degradation in Azure West EuropeResolved Sep 29, 2026 · 84h 49mResolved

# RCA # Query Performance Degradation in Azure West Europe, September 27 to October 1, 2026 ## Summary From the evening of September 27 to the morning of September 30 \(UTC\), customers in the Azure West Europe region experienced slow queries and timeouts. Writes were accepted throughout, but on some partitions, new data was not immediately queryable. Earlier incidents on this cluster \(September 7, 11, 15 and 16\) produced the same symptom with different triggers and have their own RCAs. We believe the condition described herein was the root cause of all prior incidents. ## Cause All data in the cluster is stored on redundant pods across many physical nodes. These pods read time-series data through memory-mapped files. The host’s operating system keeps the most frequently accessed parts of those files in a page cache built from memory not consumed by the pods themselves. In this region, each pod holds about 365 GB of data. The cache on a host could not hold the data its pods were querying, so reads that would normally come from cache became page faults served from disk. Each pod read about 90 MB/s from disk, thus a host with ten pods reached roughly 990 MB/s, which is near the throughput ceiling on each host. Memory consumption looked normal on every metric we monitor. The storage process itself uses little memory, and the cache takes the remainder, so a shortage would not appear as memory pressure or shortfall. At the throughput ceiling, index lookups on the write path were delayed by disk reads, causing writes to fall behind and pods to fail their replication-lag health check. Pods in this region spent 8.9% of the day past the lag threshold, against 0.09% in a comparable region. At peak, both replicas of the busiest partitions fell behind together, creating access delays which were most acutely visible through the query path. Slow disk caused health and readiness checks to time out, so healthy pods were removed from rotation and restarted. Each restart took 30 to 85 minutes to recover, during which the pod's partner carried the load alone, with the rebuild adding even more disk load. A file-reference safeguard was also causing 50\+ pod restarts a day where a normal rate would be 0. ## Remediation While early changes helped, and resolved many trouble indicators, they did not solve the root cause. We doubled query-layer capacity, restarted pods, raised the readiness timeouts, raised cleanup timeouts to avoid safeguard restarts, and doubled recovery concurrency after a restart. We ruled out a controller lock, a per-disk limit, and a single tenant's load. The root cause fix was to raise each storage pod's resource request so that each host holds fewer pods. Each pod now has twice as much memory for page cache and disk throughput. Within 1 hour of this change, query abandonment fell from 31% to 0.1%. Page faults and disk reads dropped sharply. During the next morning's peak, abandonment was 0.06%, within normal limits. ## Timeline \(UTC\) Sep 27 22:58 - Query queue depth alert fires; incident opened. Query-layer capacity increased over the next hours without lasting effect Sep 28 07:00 - Degradation at morning peak; storage pods fall behind on writes and fail health checks; stuck pods restarted one at a time Sep 28 11:33 - Restart loop identified: slow disk causes health checks to trigger restart; each restart takes 30 to 85 minutes to recover Sep 28 13:45 - Lost file-reference cleanup identified as a second source of forced restarts Sep 29 08:58 - Readiness probe timeout raised and rolled out fleet-wide Sep 29 11:10 - Throughput appears to recover; degradation returns, with 36% of queries abandoned Sep 29 16:20 - Queue clears after recovery-concurrency and probe changes Sep 30 00:25 - Cleanup timeout raised to 24 hours; forced restarts stop Sep 30 07:00 - Degradation at peak; abandonment about 55% Sep 30 11:59 - Analysis shows cache capacity per pod is too small and disk reads are at the host ceiling Sep 30 12:43 - Rollout begins to spread pods across more nodes Sep 30 13:21 - Query performance returns to normal; abandonment down to 0.1% within the hour Sep 30 14:20 - Page faults and disk reads confirmed sharply lower after rollout Oct 1 07:00 to 09:00 - Morning peak with 0.06% abandonment versus 40% to 55% the day before Oct 1 09:48 - Incident declared resolved internally ## Future mitigation We added warning alerts for page-fault rate, cache coverage, disk reads on storage volumes, and query abandonment. Each alert is designed so that cache pressure appears before causing external visibility. Runbooks now suggest major page faults as a leading indicator of storage performance degradation, with details on “relief valves” available to tune. We are continuing to track down the storage-engine reference leak and moving the disk check out of the health path. Neither leak nor check is a risk factor for triggering this type of incident; they are conditions observed during diagnosis and remediation that warrant investigation. --- [2026-10-02T18:17:38.987Z] (resolved) We appreciate the continued patience while we worked through this incident. We have been monitoring the previous fixes for the last 24 hours and all changes have responded well during sustained traffic. The region is stable and we are resolving this incident. An RCA is in progress and will be added to our status page as soon as its available. --- [2026-10-01T08:13:30.571Z] (monitoring) The cluster remains stable, and we are continuing to monitor it. --- [2026-09-30T17:16:46.712Z] (monitoring) We have increased isolation in the storage layer for the impacted region to provide greater amounts of resilience and to allow for faster recovery. We are continuing to investigate heightened memory consumption and page faults within the storage layer. Query success rates and response durations have returned to normal levels. We will continue work to increase the resiliency of this region over the next 24 hours and will carefully monitor for any increase in query latency. --- [2026-09-30T14:24:27.641Z] (monitoring) Performance has returned to normal levels following an update. We will continue to monitor. --- [2026-09-30T13:44:45.487Z] (investigating) We have made several recent changes to improve query performance and we continue to monitor the region closely. --- [2026-09-30T12:08:49.315Z] (investigating) We are continuing to investigate this issue. --- [2026-09-30T10:49:34.213Z] (investigating) We are continuing to investigate this issue. --- [2026-09-30T08:50:06.120Z] (investigating) We are still having issues in the region, the engineering team is working on it. --- [2026-09-30T07:53:39.157Z] (identified) We have identified the issue and the team is actively working on implementing a fix. --- [2026-09-30T07:34:55.022Z] (monitoring) We are working on resolving the ongoing intermittent query performance. During peak usage periods, large or complex queries may run slower than normal. Writes and data durability are not affected at this time. We have deployed several improvements overnight and further changes are in progress. --- [2026-09-29T23:31:39.791Z] (monitoring) Query performance remains stable, and we continue to monitor closely as traffic increases. We will continue to assess performance and provide updates. --- [2026-09-29T18:33:55.579Z] (monitoring) Query performance remains stable, and we continue to monitor closely. Additional mitigation and stabilization work is ongoing. --- [2026-09-29T16:39:16.891Z] (monitoring) Query performance has returned to normal levels. Planned stabilisation work is still ongoing, and we are monitoring closely. --- [2026-09-29T15:25:18.270Z] (identified) We are continuing work to remediate immediate query performance degradation, and investigating actions for a permanent fix. --- [2026-09-29T11:34:16.264Z] (identified) We are continuing to work on a fix for this issue. --- [2026-09-29T09:09:03.331Z] (identified) The issue has been identified and a fix is being implemented. --- [2026-09-29T06:38:24.885Z] (investigating) We are continuing to investigate this issue and will provide further updates as soon as available. --- [2026-09-29T05:28:12.501Z] (investigating) We are currently investigating an issue affecting query performance in Azure West Europe.

Degraded Query Performance in Azure West EuropeResolved Sep 28, 2026 · 11h 46mResolved

This incident has been resolved. --- [2026-09-28T18:01:24.078Z] (monitoring) A fix has been implemented and we are monitoring the results. --- [2026-09-28T15:08:38.481Z] (identified) We are continuing to work on a fix for this issue. --- [2026-09-28T13:10:13.328Z] (identified) We are continuing to work on a fix for this issue. --- [2026-09-28T11:45:06.078Z] (identified) We are continuing to work on a fix for this issue. --- [2026-09-28T09:54:38.250Z] (identified) Some queries may be slower than normal and recently written data may take longer to appear in results. Data ingestion and durability are not affected. We have identified the cause and mitigation is underway --- [2026-09-28T08:33:14.107Z] (investigating) We are currently investigating this issue.

Query performance degradation in Azure Westeurope.Resolved Sep 16, 2026 · 6h 48mResolved

This incident has been resolved. --- [2026-09-16T12:56:48.326Z] (monitoring) A fix has been implemented and we are monitoring the results. --- [2026-09-16T11:26:47.067Z] (identified) The issue has been identified and a fix is being implemented. --- [2026-09-16T10:08:27.413Z] (investigating) We are currently investigating this issue.

InfluxDB Cloud Uptime History

Daily uptime recorded by PulsAPI over the last 90 days, with the days that carried a InfluxDB Cloud incident marked. Each day is measured from our own checks, so the record continues even when the vendor publishes nothing.

Uptime history91 days observed
Aug 11100.00% average · 11 days with incidentsNov 9

Going further back: InfluxDB Cloud uptime by month and every recorded InfluxDB Cloud outage.

Live InfluxDB Cloud Outage Reports

Problems reported by engineers using InfluxDB Cloud. Reports often appear 10 to 20 minutes before the official status page moves, and stay on this page for 90 days.

Reports, last 24 hours0 total
24h agoNothing reportednow

No InfluxDB Cloud problems reported yet.

Something wrong with InfluxDB Cloud on your end?

Reports are anonymous, take about ten seconds, and help the next engineer who checks.

About InfluxDB Cloud

InfluxDB Cloud publishes a public status page at status.influxdata.com covering 63 components, including Web UI, Cloud Serverless: GCP and API Writes. PulsAPI tracks InfluxDB Cloud outages, degraded performance and incident history in real time, alongside the rest of your SaaS stack.

Over the past 30 days, PulsAPI has measured InfluxDB Cloud uptime at 100.00%. Response times, incident history, and SLA tracking for InfluxDB Cloud are available on the PulsAPI dashboard.

InfluxDB Cloud Status FAQ

Is InfluxDB Cloud down right now?

The verdict at the top of this page comes from the latest poll of the official InfluxDB Cloud status feed and refreshes automatically, so you are not looking at a stale cached answer. PulsAPI re-checks it every 60 seconds.

What should I do if InfluxDB Cloud is not working?

Check the component list on this page first to see if your failure matches a known outage. If it does, you can report the issue for other engineers, follow the incident timeline for vendor updates, and run any fallback your app supports until InfluxDB Cloud recovers.

How do I check InfluxDB Cloud uptime history?

PulsAPI tracks InfluxDB Cloud uptime over 30, 60, and 90-day rolling windows. The current 30-day uptime is 100.00%. The 90-day uptime strip on this page is public: no account needed. A free account adds alerts whenever InfluxDB Cloud changes state, plus 15 days of incident detail; Pro extends that to 90 days and Business to 13 months.

How fast does PulsAPI detect InfluxDB Cloud outages?

PulsAPI reads the official InfluxDB Cloud status page. PulsAPI re-checks it every 60 seconds. Alerts reach Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, PagerDuty, or email once a change has held for 5 minutes, so a one-minute blip does not page you.

Does PulsAPI track individual InfluxDB Cloud components?

Yes. PulsAPI monitors 54 individual InfluxDB Cloud components, so you can see which service or region is affected instead of a generic "service degraded" banner.

Can I get alerts when InfluxDB Cloud goes down?

Yes. Create a free account and subscribe to InfluxDB Cloud: the free plan covers three services with unlimited email alerts and no monthly notification cap. Paid plans lift the monitor limit entirely (Pro and above do not meter how many vendors you watch) and route the same alerts into Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, PagerDuty and webhooks.

How do I report an issue with InfluxDB Cloud to the community?

Click "Report an issue" at the top of this page, pick the issue type and severity, and optionally add your region and a short note. Reports are anonymous and help other engineers spot InfluxDB Cloud problems early. Official status pages often lag real incidents by 10 to 20 minutes.

Is there a free way to monitor InfluxDB Cloud?

Yes. The free plan covers 3 monitored services with unlimited email alerts, permanently, so InfluxDB Cloud plus two more costs nothing. Every new account also opens with a 30-day Business trial (unlimited monitors, Slack alerts, SLA reporting) with no credit card.

Track InfluxDB Cloud with the rest of your stack

2660+ vendors in one dashboard, and an email the moment any of them changes state. Three free, and no monitor limit at all from $29/mo, unlike the alternatives, which keep charging by the monitor.

Start free, 3 services